このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 70915
FullText URL
fulltext.pdf 1.25 MB
Author
Matsumoto, Kazuyuki Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital ORCID Kaken ID publons
Kato, Hironari Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital ORCID Kaken ID researchmap
Itoi, Takao Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University
Kitano, Masayuki Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University
Hara, Kazuo Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital
Kuwatani, Masaki Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital
Takenaka, Mamoru Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Sciences
Ashida, Reiko Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University
Mukai, Shuntaro Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University
Okuno, Nozomi Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital
Kawakubo, Kazumichi Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital
Yamazaki, Tatsuhiro Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital
Sakurai, Jun Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital
Nakatsuka, Yuki Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital
Yoshida, Michihiro Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital
Otsuka, Motoyuki Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital
Abstract
Background Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided ethanol injection (EI) has recently been introduced as one of the management strategies for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs); however, its role as a surgical alternative is unclear. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of EUS-EI in treating small PNENs through a prospective multicenter study.
Methods Patients with grade 1 tumors of ≤15 mm confirmed by pathology were included. The primary end point assessed efficacy and safety, measuring complete ablation using computed tomography at 1 and 6 months, prevention of adverse events (AEs) within 1 month, severe pancreatic fistula at 1 month, and incidence/worsening of diabetes mellitus (DM) at 6 months. The composite end point of EUS-EI was compared with that of historical results of a study based on surgical treatment.
Results 25 patients with PNENs, with a median tumor size of 10.1 mm, were treated using EUS-EI. The composite primary end point was achieved by 76.0% of patients (19/25; 95%CI 54.9%–90.6%), a proportion significantly higher than that of surgical treatment (P = 0.008). Regarding efficacy, 88.0% (22/25) of patients achieved complete ablation at 1 and 6 months (95%CI 68.8%–97.5%). Regarding safety, 96.0% (24/25) of patients had no severe AEs within 1 month (95%CI 79.7%–99.9%). No patients had severe pancreatic fistulas at 1 month, and 84.0% (21/25) had no incidence or exacerbation, or both, of DM at 6 months (95%CI 63.9%–95.5%).
Conclusion EUS-EI is safe and could be a potent treatment option for patients with small PNENs.
Published Date
2024-10-25
Publication Title
Endoscopy
Volume
volume57
Issue
issue04
Publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Start Page
321
End Page
329
ISSN
0013-726X
NCID
AA00635110
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© 2025. The Author(s).
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2452-4607
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
助成情報
( 公益財団法人内視鏡医学研究振興財団 / Japanese Foundation for Research and Promotion of Endoscopy )