FullText URL J_Orthop_Sci_22_4_715.pdf fig.pdf
Author Lu, Zhichao| Furumatsu, Takayuki| Fujii, Masataka| Maehara, Ami| Ozaki, Toshifumi|
Keywords vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) meniscus meniscal injury hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α)
Note This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Elsevier|
Published Date 2017-07
Publication Title Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Volume volume22
Issue issue4
Publisher Elsevier
Start Page 715
End Page 721
ISSN 0949-2658
NCID AA11052566
Content Type Journal Article
language 英語
OAI-PMH Set 岡山大学
Copyright Holders https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.ja
File Version author
PubMed ID 28318650
DOI 10.1016/j.jos.2017.02.006
Web of Science KeyUT 000407394700022
Related Url isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2017.02.006
JaLCDOI 10.18926/AMO/60373
FullText URL 74_4_345.pdf
Author Tanaka, Takaaki| Furumatsu, Takayuki| Hiranaka, Takaaki| Okazaki, Yuki| Masudaa, Kenji| Senoa, Noritaka| Ozaki, Toshifumi|
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate tunnel coalition and inter-tunnel distance by comparing the tibial tunnel position in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction performed with a conventional guide versus a posterolateral (PL) divergence (PLD) guide. Subjects were 43 patients (ACL tip aimer: 20 knees; PLD guide: 23 knees) who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction between September 2014 and December 2017. In all cases, the tibial tunnel position, tunnel edge distance and tunnel angles were evaluated based on CT images. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and Lysholm score. Tibial tunnel positions were similar between the conventional and PLD guide groups, while tibial tunnel edge distance was significantly less in the conventional group. Tunnel coalition was observed in 5 knees in the conventional and no knees in the PLD guide group. Distance between two tibial tunnel centers was 9.1 mm for the tip aimer, and 10.5 mm for the PLD guide. Creation of the PL tunnel tended to involve insertion from a more medial aspect for the PLD guide group than the conventional guide group. No differences in clinical outcomes were noted. The PLD guide can be used to create anatomically-positioned PL tunnels, and reduce the probability of occurrence of tunnel coalition.
Keywords anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tibial tunnel position PL divergence guide tunnel coalition
Amo Type Original Article
Published Date 2020-08
Publication Title Acta Medica Okayama
Volume volume74
Issue issue4
Publisher Okayama University Medical School
Start Page 345
End Page 350
ISSN 0386-300X
NCID AA00508441
Content Type Journal Article
language 英語
Copyright Holders CopyrightⒸ 2020 by Okayama University Medical School
File Version publisher
Refereed True
PubMed ID 32843766
JaLCDOI 10.18926/AMO/57715
FullText URL 73_6_511.pdf
Author Takahara, Yasuhiro| Furumatsu, Takayuki| Nakashima, Hirotaka| Itani, Satoru| Nakamura, Makoto| Uchida, Yoichiro| Kato, Hisayoshi| Tsujimura, Yoshitaka| Iwasaki, Yuichi| Ochi, Nobuaki|
Abstract Medial open- and lateral closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (hybrid CWHTO) can overcome the limitations of conventional CWHTO and open-wedge HTO (OWHTO) for medial compartmental osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Hybrid CWHTO increases stability by using a rigid locking plate and allows early full weight-bearing. However, the literature contains no information about time to bone union after this new procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the time to bone union after hybrid CWHTO. We reviewed 44 knees treated with hybrid CWHTO. Patients were able to stand on both legs on the day after surgery and walked with full weight-bearing within 4 weeks of the procedure. The time to achievement of bone union at the osteotomy site was defined as the number of months until bone union was confirmed on radiographic imaging. The mean time to radiographic confirmation of bone union was 4.5±1.5 months after surgery. Eleven knees (25.0%) required 6 months or more. Radiographic analysis and JOA score improved significantly between before and 1 year after surgery (p<0.01). Hybrid CWHTO is a very useful method for treating medial OA, but radiographic bone union requires 4.5 months on average. We must be aware of bone union after hybrid CWHTO.
Keywords bone union hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy osteoarthritis
Amo Type Original Article
Note ,|
Published Date 2019-12
Publication Title Acta Medica Okayama
Volume volume73
Issue issue6
Publisher Okayama University Medical School
Start Page 511
End Page 516
ISSN 0386-300X
NCID AA00508441
Content Type Journal Article
language 英語
Copyright Holders CopyrightⒸ 2019 by Okayama University Medical School
File Version publisher
Refereed True
PubMed ID 31871333
Web of Science KeyUT 000503431400006
JaLCDOI 10.18926/AMO/57713
FullText URL 73_6_495.pdf
Author Masuda, Shin| Furumatsu, Takayuki| Okazaki, Yoshiki| Kamatsuki, Yusuke| Okazaki, Yuki| Kodama, Yuya| Hiranaka, Takaaki| Nakata, Eiji| Ozaki, Toshifumi|
Abstract Medial meniscus posterior root tear causes rapid knee cartilage degradation by inducing posteromedial displacement of the medial meniscus. We evaluated medial meniscus posterior extrusion before and after pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear using magnetic resonance images. Twenty-eight patients with symptomatic medial meniscus posterior root tear were included. The inclusion criteria were: acute (< 3 months) or chronic (≥3 months) medial meniscus posterior root tear after painful popping events. The exclusion criteria were: other meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. We measured medial meniscus posterior extrusion and medial meniscus anteroposterior interval at knee flexion angles of 10° and 90° preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. The posterior extrusion at 90° knee flexion decreased from 4.42±1.38 mm preoperatively to 3.09±1.06 mm (p<0.001) postoperatively, while at 10° knee flexion it was −4.17±1.63 mm preoperatively and −3.77±1.72mm postoperatively, showing no significant change. The anteroposterior interval at 10° knee flexion increased from 19.74±4.27 mm preoperatively to 22.15±5.10 mm postoperatively (p<0.001); at 90° knee flexion, it increased from 16.81±4.51 mm preoperatively to 19.20±4.30 mm postoperatively (p<0.001). Medial meniscus posterior extrusion and movement decreased after pullout repair. Pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear improves medial meniscus posterior extrusion, especially at 90° knee flexion.
Keywords medial meniscus posterior root tear pullout repair extrusion open magnetic resonance imaging
Amo Type Original Article
Published Date 2019-12
Publication Title Acta Medica Okayama
Volume volume73
Issue issue6
Publisher Okayama University Medical School
Start Page 495
End Page 501
ISSN 0386-300X
NCID AA00508441
Content Type Journal Article
language 英語
Copyright Holders CopyrightⒸ 2019 by Okayama University Medical School
File Version publisher
Refereed True
PubMed ID 31871331
Web of Science KeyUT 000503431400004
FullText URL OTSR105_1_113.pdf Fig.pdf
Author Okazaki, Yuki| Furumatsu, Takayuki| Kodama, Yuya| Hino, Tomohito| Kamatsuki, Yusuke| Okazaki, Yoshiki| Masuda, Shin| Miyazawa, Shinichi| Endo, Hirosuke| Tetsunaga, Tomonori| Yamada, Kazuki| Ozaki, Toshifumi|
Keywords Magnetic resonance imaging Medial meniscus Posterior root tear Tibial rotation Transtibial pullout repair
Published Date 2019-02-28
Publication Title Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
Volume volume105
Issue issue1
Publisher Elsevier
Start Page 113
End Page 117
ISSN 18770568
Content Type Journal Article
language 日本語
OAI-PMH Set 岡山大学
File Version author
PubMed ID 30482466
DOI 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.10.005
Web of Science KeyUT 000456541300019
Related Url isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.10.005
Author Okazaki, Yuki| Furumatsu, Takayuki| Kamatsuki, Yusuke| Okazaki, Yoshiki| Masuda, Shin| Hiranaka, Takaaki| Kodama, Yuya| Miyazawa, Shinichi| Ozaki, Toshifumi|
Keywords Anterior cruciate ligament Lateral meniscus Posterior root tear Transtibial pullout repair Meniscus extrusion
Note This fulltext is available in Apr. 2021.|
Published Date 2020-04-08
Publication Title Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
Volume volume106
Issue issue3
Publisher Elsevier
Start Page 469
End Page 473
ISSN 1877-0568
Content Type Journal Article
language 英語
File Version Author
PubMed ID 32278734
DOI 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.022
Web of Science KeyUT 000539660200014
Related Url isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.022