ID | 61083 |
フルテキストURL | |
著者 |
Goldman, Jonathan W.
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Garassino, Marina Chiara
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Chen, Yuanbin
Cancer & Hematology Centers of Western Michigan
Özgüroğlu, Mustafa
Istanbul University–Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine
Dvorkin, Mikhail
BHI of Omsk Region Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Trukhin, Dmytro
Odessa National Medical University
Statsenko, Galina
Omsk Regional Cancer Center,
Ji, Jun Ho
Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
Hochmair, Maximilian J.
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Lung Research and Pulmonary Oncology, Klinik Floridsdorf
Voitko, Oleksandr
Kyiv City Clinical Oncological Centre
Havel, Libor
Thomayer Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University
Poltoratskiy, Artem
Petrov Research Institute of Oncology
Losonczy, György
Semmelweis University
Reinmuth, Niels
Asklepios Lung Clinic
Patel, Nikunj
AstraZeneca
Laud, Peter J.
Statistical Services Unit, University of Sheffield
Shire, Norah
AstraZeneca
Jiang, Haiyi
AstraZeneca
Paz-Ares, Luis
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, H120-CNIO Lung Cancer Unit, Universidad Complutense and Ciberonc
|
抄録 | Objectives
In the phase III CASPIAN study, first-line durvalumab plus etoposide in combination with either cisplatin or carboplatin (EP) significantly improved overall survival (primary endpoint) versus EP alone in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) at the interim analysis. Here we report patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Materials and methods
Treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC received 4 cycles of durvalumab plus EP every 3 weeks followed by maintenance durvalumab every 4 weeks until progression, or up to 6 cycles of EP every 3 weeks. PROs, assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) version 3 and its lung cancer module, the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13), were prespecified secondary endpoints. Changes from baseline to disease progression or 12 months in prespecified key disease-related symptoms (cough, dyspnea, chest pain, fatigue, appetite loss) were analyzed with a mixed model for repeated measures. Time to deterioration (TTD) of symptoms, functioning, and global health status/quality of life (QoL) from randomization was analyzed.
Results
In the durvalumab plus EP and EP arms, 261 and 260 patients were PRO-evaluable. Patients in both arms experienced numerically reduced symptom burden over 12 months or until progression for key symptoms. For the improvements from baseline in appetite loss, the between-arm difference was statistically significant, favoring durvalumab plus EP (difference, −4.5; 99% CI: −9.04, −0.04; nominal p = 0.009). Patients experienced longer TTD with durvalumab plus EP versus EP for all symptoms (hazard ratio [95% CI] for key symptoms: cough 0.78 [0.600‒1.026]; dyspnea 0.79 [0.625‒1.006]; chest pain 0.76 [0.575‒0.996]; fatigue 0.82 [0.653‒1.027]; appetite loss 0.70 [0.542‒0.899]), functioning, and global health status/QoL.
Conclusion
Addition of durvalumab to first-line EP maintained QoL and delayed worsening of patient-reported symptoms, functioning, and global health status/QoL compared with EP.
|
キーワード | Small-cell lung cancer
Durvalumab
Platinum-etoposide
CASPIAN
Patient-reported outcomes
Health-related quality of life
|
発行日 | 2020-11
|
出版物タイトル |
Lung Cancer
|
巻 | 149巻
|
出版者 | Elsevier
|
開始ページ | 46
|
終了ページ | 52
|
ISSN | 0169-5002
|
NCID | AA10785743
|
資料タイプ |
学術雑誌論文
|
言語 |
英語
|
OAI-PMH Set |
岡山大学
|
著作権者 | © 2020 The Authors.
|
論文のバージョン | publisher
|
PubMed ID | |
DOI | |
Web of Science KeyUT | |
関連URL | isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.09.003
|
ライセンス | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
|