ID | 56598 |
Sort Key | 4
|
フルテキストURL | |
著者 |
大森 秀臣
岡山大学大学院社会文化科学研究科
|
抄録 | Republicanism has been divided into two strands, neo-Athenian and neo-Roman. This division, unlike others, is made in its historical origin. These strands are distinctive in their own conceptions of liberty: neo-Athenians view liberty as self-government while neo-Romans it as non-domination. Accordingly they have different views of the relationship between liberty and the rule of law: neo-Athenians see it as circular while neo-Romans as constitutive. Their views give us new perspectives and make us conscious of their defects as well; neo-Athenians cannot expel domination from selfgoverning politics while neo-Romans cannot show that legal rule protecting non-domination has its own public legitimacy. However, they prove to be complementary and give rich resources for our debate over the rule of law.
|
備考 | 論説 (Article)
|
出版物タイトル |
岡山大學法學會雜誌
|
発行日 | 2019-03-19
|
巻 | 68巻
|
号 | 3-4号
|
出版者 | 岡山大学法学会
|
出版者(別表記) | The Association of Law of Okayama University
|
開始ページ | 926
|
終了ページ | 879
|
ISSN | 0386-3050
|
NCID | AN00033040
|
資料タイプ |
紀要論文
|
OAI-PMH Set |
岡山大学
|
言語 |
英語
|
論文のバージョン | publisher
|
査読 |
有り
|
NAID | |
Eprints Journal Name | olj
|