このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 56598
Sort Key
4
フルテキストURL
著者
大森 秀臣 岡山大学大学院社会文化科学研究科
抄録
Republicanism has been divided into two strands, neo-Athenian and neo-Roman. This division, unlike others, is made in its historical origin. These strands are distinctive in their own conceptions of liberty: neo-Athenians view liberty as self-government while neo-Romans it as non-domination. Accordingly they have different views of the relationship between liberty and the rule of law: neo-Athenians see it as circular while neo-Romans as constitutive. Their views give us new perspectives and make us conscious of their defects as well; neo-Athenians cannot expel domination from selfgoverning politics while neo-Romans cannot show that legal rule protecting non-domination has its own public legitimacy. However, they prove to be complementary and give rich resources for our debate over the rule of law.
備考
論説 (Article)
出版物タイトル
岡山大學法學會雜誌
発行日
2019-03-19
68巻
3-4号
出版者
岡山大学法学会
出版者(別表記)
The Association of Law of Okayama University
開始ページ
926
終了ページ
879
ISSN
0386-3050
NCID
AN00033040
資料タイプ
紀要論文
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
言語
英語
論文のバージョン
publisher
査読
有り
NAID
Eprints Journal Name
olj