A retrospective cohort study comparing periodontal regeneration using fibroblast growth factor‐2 versus autologous bone graft

Background: Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) is a novel agent utilized in periodontal regeneration therapy. However, its clinical efficacy compared with autologous bone graft (ABG), a long-established treatment, remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of FGF-2 and ABG and to assess the impact of patient background factors on outcomes when using FGF-2.
Methods: We collected the subjects from January 2013 to September 2023. Clinical outcomes included the vertical bone defect improvement rate (VBDIR) and the probing pocket depth improvement (PPDI). Clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), adjusting for age, sex, smoking history, and hypertension. Additionally, a multilevel linear analysis was performed to assess factors influencing outcomes in FGF-2.
Results: A total of 180 sites from 141 patients (FGF-2: 150 sites; ABG: 30 sites) were evaluated. Both VBDIR and PPDI significantly improved postoperatively in both groups. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between FGF-2 and ABG. In FGF-2, smoking history was positively associated, while the preoperative bone defect angle (BDA) was negatively associated with clinical outcomes.
Conclusions: FGF-2 might exhibit clinical outcomes comparable to those of ABG, suggesting it is a clinically viable alternative for vertical bone defects. When using FGF-2, patient-specific factors such as smoking history and preoperative BDA should be considered carefully.
The name in the trial registry: A survey of clinical practice and evaluation of treatment outcomes of periodontal regenerative therapy using REGROTH at Okayama University Hospital