| ID | 30203 |
| フルテキストURL | |
| 著者 |
Nakata, Takayoshi
Okayama University
Takahashi, N.
Okayama University
Fujiwara, K.
Okayama University
Imai, T.
Okayama University
Muramatsu, Kazuhiro
ALPS Electric Company Limited, Miyagi
|
| 抄録 | In order to evaluate the most suitable method of analysis (A- phi or T- Omega method) and finite element (nodal or edge element) for a given problem, the features of each method and element have been investigated. The accuracy, computer storage, and CPU time of each method and element are compared for a 3-D nonlinear magnetostatic model and a 3-D eddy current model. The flux and eddy current densities calculated are compared with those measured. It is shown that the accuracy and the CPU time of the edge element are better than those of the nodal element. The A- phi method is better than T- Omega method for nonlinear problems from the viewpoint of convergence characteristics of nonlinear iterations. |
| キーワード | eddy currents
electrical engineering computing
finite element analysis
magnetic fields
magnetostatics
|
| 備考 | Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/20.104996
Published with permission from the copyright holder. This is the institute's copy, as published in Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on, Sep 1991, Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 4073-4076. Publisher URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/20.104996 Copyright © 1991 IEEE. All rights reserved. |
| 発行日 | 1991-09-01
|
| 出版物タイトル |
Magnetics
|
| 巻 | 27巻
|
| 号 | 5号
|
| 開始ページ | 4073
|
| 終了ページ | 4076
|
| 資料タイプ |
学術雑誌論文
|
| 言語 |
英語
|
| 査読 |
有り
|
| DOI | |
| Submission Path | electricity_and_magnetism/32
|
