<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-31J"?>
<ArticleSet xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Estonian Literary Museum Scholarly Press</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2307-700X</Issn>
      <Volume>13</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Responding to humor online: an exploratory L2 study on the effect of instruction</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">321</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>326</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Caleb</FirstName>
        <LastName>Prichard</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Audrey</FirstName>
        <LastName>Rousse-Malpat</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Groningen University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi"/>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>Although L2 learners report having great difficulty responding to humour, research on this area is lacking. There is also a relative lack of studies on whether there is the need for humour instruction for European learners of other European languages. Therefore, this pilot study explored instruction on humour responses for learners of French at a Dutch university. Participants reported that humour instruction is warranted in their B2-level French class.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">humour responses</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">L2 humour</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">humour competency</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">humour convergence</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学グローバル・パートナーズ, 岡山大学教育開発センター, 岡山大学言語教育センター, 岡山大学キャリア開発センター</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1881-5952</Issn>
      <Volume>11</Volume>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Why the “Silent Finns” Have the Loudest Classrooms and Implications for Japanese Universities</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">127</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>138</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Caleb</FirstName>
        <LastName>Prichard</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Thomas</FirstName>
        <LastName>Fast</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/54541</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>Finnish education may be a model for Japanese universities as they look to promote active learning pedagogies. Based on observations and interviews with influential educators from several Finnish institutions, this article overviews key aspects of education in Finland, especially those related to deep learning. The role of faculty development, learning spaces, and co-teaching are also examined. Finally, a pilot course implemented at Okayama University in which the authors aimed to apply key ideas learned in Finland will be described.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">active learning</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">deep learning</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Finnish education</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">faculty development</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学グローバル・パートナーズ, 岡山大学教育開発センター, 岡山大学言語教育センター, 岡山大学キャリア開発センター</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1881-5952</Issn>
      <Volume>10</Volume>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2014</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Reading Strategy Use of Low- and High-Proficiency Learners and the Effect of Reading Instruction</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">115</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>122</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Caleb</FirstName>
        <LastName>Prichard</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/53178</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>Research suggests that reading strategy usage is influential on L2 reading proficiency.
Considering this, the LEC English Department decided to examine students’ reading strategies as
a part of its much larger curricular review. The results support existing research showing that
more-proficient readers use somewhat more varied strategy usage. Posttest results reveal that a
course on reading skills led to some minimal improvements in top-down reading strategies.
Implications are discussed.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">ESOL</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">reading</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">strategy usage</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">curriculum</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学グローバル・パートナーズ, 岡山大学教育開発センター, 岡山大学言語教育センター, 岡山大学キャリア開発センター</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1881-5952</Issn>
      <Volume>10</Volume>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2014</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Critical Thinking and Learning Commons: Initial Observations and Possible Applications</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">93</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>104</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Thomas</FirstName>
        <LastName>Fast</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Caleb</FirstName>
        <LastName>Prichard</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Akemi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Morioka</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">John</FirstName>
        <LastName>Rucynski</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/53176</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>This article reports on the first year activities and findings of the Learning
Commons Study Group (ラーニングコモンズ活用分科会), which was formed
to oversee the Okayama University Library renovation. Below is a description
of our visits to other libraries, class, workshops and presentation observations.
Pedagogically analysis was done through the lens of active learning, contentbased
instruction in language learning (CBI), and other related theories and
approaches. Concluding thoughts on utilizing Okayama University’s new
learning commons and promoting critical thinking on campus is provided.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Learning Commons</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">active learning</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">content-based instruction(CBI)</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">critical thinking</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Theory of Knowledge (TOK)</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学国際センター, 岡山大学教育開発センター, 岡山大学言語教育センター, 岡山大学キャリア開発センター</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1881-5952</Issn>
      <Volume>9</Volume>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2013</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Okayama University LEC English Program Evaluation Plan and Pretest Results</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">181</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>194</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Caleb</FirstName>
        <LastName>Prichard</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/52201</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>This article describes the methods and rationale of the Okayama University LEC English
Program evaluation. The methods include summative measures （TOEIC and TOEIC
SW） to see if the program is helping students improve their English proficiency.
Formative measures are also being utilized to understand various aspects of students’
communicative competence and language learning to consider ways to improve the
program. These measures include surveys on learner affect（ motivation and anxiety）, a
reading strategy survey, and vocabulary tests. The results of the pretest measures will
be reported and possible implications will be discussed.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">program evaluation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">curriculum</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">administration</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
