<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-31J"?>
<ArticleSet xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学グローバル・パートナーズ, 岡山大学教育開発センター, 岡山大学言語教育センター, 岡山大学キャリア開発センター</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1881-5952</Issn>
      <Volume>10</Volume>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2014</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>A Discussion of Practitioner Research: How Are Reflective Practice, Action Research, and Exploratory Practice Different?</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">105</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>114</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Ian</FirstName>
        <LastName>Nakamura</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/53177</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>　The time has come to see the three major forms of Practitioner Research under a general umbrella
as well as distinct choices and commitments to pursue professional self-inquiry into the way and ways
we teach and how our students (may) learn. The focus of this paper is on understanding each approach
by tracing its origins and key concepts. The aim of this working paper is to take the first step in
building an accessible foundation of knowledge from which classroom teachers can then pursue their
own interest or concern in the method that appeals to them the most.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">practitioner research</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">reflection</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">action</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">exploration</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">comparison</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学国際センター, 岡山大学教育開発センター, 岡山大学言語教育センター, 岡山大学キャリア開発センター</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1881-5952</Issn>
      <Volume>9</Volume>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2013</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Reflective Practice for Professional Development: A Preliminary Consideration of What We Can Learn about Teaching from Movies about Teachers</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">155</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>168</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Ian</FirstName>
        <LastName>Nakamura</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/52199</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>　This exploratory study will begin with a review of cinematic portrayals of teachers
and their situations by establishing three categories: thought-provoking stories of
teachers and students trying to overcome social barriers, entertainment first productions
with an uplifting resolution of conflict, and documentaries that track the real-life
struggles and successes of educational practitioners and their students through projectbased
training and performance. Then I will use forms of reflective practice and
discourse analysis to delve deeper into the details of teaching and context. This working
paper will conclude with some thoughts on what ‘good’ teachers do.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">films</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">reflection</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">teachers</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">students</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">professional development</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学国際センター, 岡山大学教育開発センター, 岡山大学言語教育センター, 岡山大学キャリア開発センター</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1881-5952</Issn>
      <Volume>8</Volume>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2012</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Reflections on Learning from a Study Leave: One Year Later</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">151</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>162</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Ian</FirstName>
        <LastName>Nakamura</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/49297</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>Surviving, thriving, and evolving followed by further noticing, reflecting, and acting are
some of the stages a teacher-researcher goes through before, during, and after the study
leave experience. Having the opportunity to literally remove oneself from the daily
concerns, routines, and habits entrenched in one’s local institutional context for an
extended period of time（ e.g., six months） is an experience like no other. Blood donation
campaigns call giving blood ‘a gift that keeps on giving’. While the majority of people in
our profession do carry on with their work quite well without ever going on a study
leave （or donating blood）, an important revelation that I have had is: a study leave is
also ‘a gift that keeps on giving’.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">study leave</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">professional development</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">reflective learning</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
