<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2433-4146</Issn>
      <Volume>49</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>「実質所得者課税の原則」に関する一考察 : 所得の人的帰属認定における経済的アプローチの意義</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">23</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>39</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Mikio</FirstName>
        <LastName>Morishita</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/55230</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>The purpose of this paper is to consider the meaning of "economic substance" in taxation.
　In Japanese Income Tax Act （Article 12）, where a person to whom the revenue is legally imputed is merely
nominal and other person enjoys it, the tax shall be imposed on the person who actually enjoys the revenue. This is called "the Principle of taxation on Actual Beneficiary".  But it is not always easy to determine the person who actually enjoys the revenue from assets or business. In such a case, there are two ways of thinking. The first is a way of thinking in which a valid private-law contract is considered more important than economic substance. The second is a way of thinking in which economic substance is considered more important than a private-law contract.
　This provision（ Article 12） was enacted in 1950＇s, but opinions are divided among scholars on this point and there is room for further consideration. This paper will be considered this subject from legal and economic viewpoints.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>48</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>所得税法における所得分類の現代的意義 : 20世紀型所得分類課税方式の課題</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">19</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>34</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Mikio</FirstName>
        <LastName>Morishita</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/54900</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>48</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>消費税法における納税義務者に関する一考察 ―免税事業者の法的位置づけの視点から―</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>22</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Mikio</FirstName>
        <LastName>Morishita</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/54704</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>48</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>法人税法22条４項の公正処理基準の現代的意義 ―企業会計制度との関係性の視点から―</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">15</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>44</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Mikio</FirstName>
        <LastName>Morishita</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/54473</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>47</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>我が国における「法律による行政の原理」と「租税法律主義」の相克 ―租税法に係る文書回答制度の現代的意義と可能性―</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">97</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>122</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Mikio</FirstName>
        <LastName>Morishita</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/54162</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
