Refractive Error Correction With Glasses in Congenital Ocular Fundus Anomalies: A Retrospective Series of 18 Children With Different Disease Entities Followed Up for More Than 10 Years

Objectives: Children with congenital anomalies of the posterior segment of the eye are in the process of visual development, and thus, their refractive errors should be detected by cycloplegic refraction testing to prescribe full-correction glasses, if required, and to help their visual acuity develop with growth. This study aimed to review refractive correction in children with congenital ocular fundus anomalies.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 18 consecutive children (11 female and seven male children) who were diagnosed with ocular fundus anomalies and followed for 10 years or more by a single ophthalmologist at a referral-based hospital. The age at the initial visit ranged from 10 days after birth to 11 years, with a median of one year and four months, and the age at the last visit ranged from 10 to 32 years, with a median of 15 years. The follow-up periods ranged from 10 to 21 years at a median of 15 years.
Results: The diagnoses were familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) in eight children, persistent fetal vasculature (PFV) in five, morning glory disc anomaly in two, optic nerve and choroidal coloboma (CHARGE syndrome) in two, and Coats disease in one. Full-correction glasses were prescribed in eight children, while the remaining 10 children did not wear glasses. Among nine children with the uncorrected visual acuity of 1.0 or better in one eye and the visual acuity in the other eye ranging from light perception to 0.01, eight children did not wear glasses, and one child wore glasses with hyperopic correction. The diagnoses in these nine children were PFV in five children, morning glory disc anomaly in two, FEVR in one, and Coats disease in one. In seven children who wore full-correction glasses, the best corrected visual acuity in the better eye ranged from 0.2 to 0.9 at a median of 0.5. In contrast, the visual acuity in the other eye ranged from light perception to 0.1 at a median of 0.03. The diagnoses of these seven children were FEVR in five children and CHARGE syndrome in two. The five children with FEVR showed myopic astigmatism in both eyes, while the two children with CHARGE syndrome showed hyperopic astigmatism in both eyes.
Conclusion: Children with unilateral eye anomalies such as PFV and morning glory disc anomaly did not wear glasses since their healthy eyes had good uncorrected visual acuity. In contrast, children with involvement of both eyes in FEVR and CHARGE syndrome wore full-correction glasses. Rough information regarding full-correction glasses in each category would help clinicians cope with rare congenital eye diseases. However, this conclusion is generally applicable to the standard practice of pediatric ophthalmology.