岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30694242011吉田廣作メモランダムについて―満洲製鉄鞍山本社におけるソ連軍の設備撤去の記録―139154ENToshiroMatsumotoNo potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30691231980戦前日本の対中事業投資額推移1900-193097136ENToshirōMatsumoto10.18926/OER/42235No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30691341982満州鉄鋼業開発の実態について―元昭和製鋼所企画課長水津利輔氏に聞く―235250ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/42216No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30691321981満州鉄鋼業と日本の総力戦体制（I）―価格問題についての覚え書―85124ENToshirōMatsumoto10.18926/OER/42202No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30691531983満州五ヶ年計画期の鉄鋼増産計画（II・完）157182ENToshirohMatsumoto10.18926/OER/42132No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30691511983満州五ヶ年計画期の鉄鋼増産計画（I）97111ENToshirohMatsumoto10.18926/OER/42117No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30691641985震災復興期の東京府下朝鮮人労働者に関する人口・職業分析107145ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/42108No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-3069173-41986『東洋経済新報』 と15年戦争―対中，対満政策論を中心に―391411ENToshirohMatsumoto10.18926/OER/42074No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-306917119851930年代の東京府下朝鮮人人口推移179213ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/42049No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30691831986満鉄輸送統計と関東州貿易201210ENToshirohMatsumoto10.18926/OER/42029No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-3069193-41988関東州， 満鉄付属地の経済と日本の植民地支配299325ENToshirohMatsumoto10.18926/OER/42000No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30691921987アジアにおける近代化の展望と後退するマルクス主義245267ENToshirohMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41986No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30692141990木村健二 『在朝日本人の社会史』143153ENToshiroMatsumotoNo potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-3069223-41991工作機械メーカーにおけるCIM化の実態―FMS化の経験蓄積とCIM化の戦略設定について―177192ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41889No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30692211990外国人労働者問題年表，1987年1月-1990年2月131172ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41870No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30692311991Problems concerning the Study of History of Colonies in Japan87106ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41837No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30692531994「満洲」研究の現状についての覚え書き―「満洲国」期を中心に―221237ENToshirohMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41759No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-3069251-21993第2次大戦期の戦時体制構想立案の動き―「美濃部洋次文書」にみる日満支経済協議会，大東亜建設審議会の活動―99123ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41739No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-3069263-419951940年代後半における昭和製鋼所の操業状態について（I）211223ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41723No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-306927319951940年代後半における昭和製鋼所の操業状態について（III）6179ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41685No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-306927119951940年代後半における昭和製鋼所の操業状態について（II）83104ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41668No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-306928119961940年代後半の鞍山日本人社会に関する歴史年表―『鞍山回想録石川義助先生を憶う』，『鉄都鞍山の回顧』を中心に―147174ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41618In this paper I introduce two diaries written by the Japanese settlers who were forsaken in Anshan, Liaoning province, by the Guandong Anny in 1945. I also present a chronological table about Anshan during the civil war between the Nationalist and the Communist, cross checking these diaries with the other historical materials. The abandoned settlers spent hard and horrible days in the period. Some of them were forced to help the reconstruction of Anshan Iron and Steel Company. So their diaries give us the valuable information to comprehend the situation of Anshan and A.I.S.C. One of the diaries was written by an ex-clerk of Showa Iron and Steel Works(later A.I.S.C.). It tells us the daily incidents around his life. Another diary teaches us the political and economic circumstances in Anshan. The author of the latter had been one of the leaders of the Japanese Settlement Corporation at Anshan and was arrested once by the Eight Root Anny. He described his unusual experience vividly in the diary.No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30693041999満洲鉄鋼業研究の新地平167183ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41569This paper is aimed at summing up T. Matsumoto's recent academic achievements regarding Anshan Iron & Steel Co. in northeast China. The important facts raised therein are as follows. AISC rapidly recovered its facilities in the first half of 1950s. The production level of AISC resumed its maximum prewar level between 1952 to 1954. How was it possible to restore the equipment which had been heavily damaged from the WWII and the Chinese Civil War in such a short period? A marvelous reconstruction of AISC in 'Three Year Reconstruction Period' after 1949 was a result realized by the combination of many
factors: (1) exceptional enthusiasm for reconstruction among young Chinese engineers and workers who were sent to Anshan and trained there; (2) the flexible man power policy of Eight Route Army controlling their hostile emotion to the ex-enemies, pursuing the latest and rational know-how, and challenging to create a new steel production technology; (3) availability and cooperation of the Japanese and the ex-Nationalist
Chinese engineers; (4) remaining equipments and captured documents; (5) experience and skills ofremaining Chinese workers. With all these five
factors combined, AISC dramatically recovered its facility, and restored its prewar level in a few years.No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30693031999満洲鉄鋼業研究の現状163182ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41551The iron and steel industry in northeast China has been playing an important role both in the Manchukuo period and the Socialist China. The academic achievements of the historical analysis concerning the industry during 1940s and 1950s, however, has not been so rich, because of the following two reasons; (1) lack of historical materials; (2) ideological obstacles against recognizing the rapid economic development under the Manchukuo regime and its aftermath toward the new born China. Many historical resources were lost in the chaos during and just after the WWII. None the less, not negligible amount ofmaterials exist not only in Anshan but in Nanjing, Taipei, Tokyo, Washington, London etc., crossing widely the boundaries of the counties. The iron and steel industry is a key military industry. For this reason, the Communist and the Nationalist had strictly prohibited researchers to use their collections until 1980s. On the other hand, the image on the socialism had for long been simply stereotyped as justice or liberation among the historians in Japan after 1945. Such a situation reflexes the important truth of the history. It has, however, made the research angle of the historians inadequate to recognize the positive aspects of the industry developed by colonial authorities.No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-306930119981940年代後半における昭和製鋼所の製鋼工場4361ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41530The Showa Iron & Steel Works (the Anshan Iron & Steel Co. after the war) lost over 60% of its steel-smelting facility when the Red Army (The
Soviet Army) confiscated the equipment of the company. One of its two steel-smelting factories was completely destroyed. The production capacity fell down from 1,330,000 tons / year to 500,000 tons / year. The AISC, however, recovered its maximum pre-war level in 1952-53. The output of steel ingot was 843,000 in 1943, 770,000 in 1952, and 976,000 in 1953. This paper aims to examine the reason why the operation of the company recovered so quickly in spite of its serious war damage. The factors which enabled the company to rebuild its production were as follows: (1) the remaining equipment of the first steel-smelting
factory; (2) highly educated and well trained Japanese engineers; (3) documents of SISW concerning the operation of its equipment; (4) flexible leadership of the AISC; (5) strong motivation of Chinese engineers and Chinese workers. Technical knowledge and experience were quite important for the AISC, especially when it started its operation. Some parts ofthe first steel-smelting factory was much improved by the Chinese engineers, using the then existing documents of SISW. A conversion of preliminary smelting furnaces to open hearth furnaces was the most successful example. Chinese engineers bravely tried an un-experienced method in the face of Japanese engineers' warning, considering the new circumstances for steel production. Unbelievable hard work of Chinese engineers and workers sustained those process. All of these factors were necessary to accomplish the rapid reconstruction of the company.No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30693142000満洲製鉄鞍山本社の空襲被害, 1944年303323ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41523US Air Force bombed the Manshu Iron & Steel Company (MISC) in Anshan five times in 1944. All these air raids were organized by the 20 th Air Force of the US based in Chengdu, Sichuang province, and two attacks among five left the MISC serious damages. The B 29, the Superfortress, which was newly developed in the US and distributed to the China theater in April of 1944, was mobilized in the operations. The damage of the MISC between July to November 1944 was quite heavy, and losses to assumed output became huge as follows; coke 46.5%, pig iron 50.2%, steel ingot 58.3, rolled steel 62.4%. Those damages were, however, quickly recovered to considerably high level by March of 1945, i.e. coke 93.8%, pig iron 99.1%, steel ingot 73.2%, rolled steel 98.3%. Even after the confiscation by the Russian Red Army, the coke sector resumed its production ability to over 88% by 1953. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the degree of the air raid damages, and to describe the reconstruction process of the coke sector, which was most seriously destroyed by those bombings. The report of the United States Strategic Bombing Survey and some unknown memoirs written by the ex-staff of the MISC are used as main sources.No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30693111999中国東北の戦後情勢―国共内戦の帰結と鞍山の政治情勢―1961ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/41485This paper is aimed at outlining the final stage of the Chinese Civil War in northeast China. While the CCW ended in October, 1949, when Maozedong declared his final victory at the Tian-anmen square, the war in northeast China had already finished in November, 1948, eleven months earlier than Maozedong's speech. USSR supported Yan-an by prohibiting the Nationalist to use Port
Arthur, and by delivering the weapons, which the Japanese army had left behind, to the Communist after the surrender of Japan. US kept giving
huge financial and military aids to the Nationalist since the period of the WWII. Both super powers, however, forced their ideological partners to compromise with their rivals so often. USSR concluded the Sino-Russo Peace League Treaty with the Nationalist Government in August, 1945, believing the victory of the Nationalist, and made joint developing plans for the northeast with it. This treaty forbade USSR to assist the
Communist. USSR also feared the deep commitment of US to the northeast. Because of these restrictions, USSR sometimes ordered the Communist to retreat from important cities. On the other hand, Yan-an's strong resistance against the Chongqing (Chungking) lead US to arbitrate between two Chinese parties, the Nationalist and the Communist. US feared the bankruptcy of the Nationalist Government and the collapse of the Chinese society, in order to prevent Chinese from accepting the Communist as a new leader. For these reasons, the process of the CCW became complicated in the second half of 1940 s.No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学経済学会Acta Medica Okayama0386-30694042009＜資料紹介＞ 米国外交資料に見る１９５０年代前半の中国ならびに中国東北経済189199ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/OER/14948No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.岡山大学大学院文化科学研究科Acta Medica Okayama1880-8476412007中国東北における工業発展の長期的動向、1949-1988年2945ENToshiroMatsumoto10.18926/10967本稿では、中華人民共和国が建国された1949年以後の中国東北における工業発展の推移を、中国国家統計局ならびに遼寧省、吉林省、黒竜江省各統計局の統計資料に基づいて、軽工業、重工業別に概観する。この場合、軽工業は消費財生産分野を、重工業は生産財生産分野を指しており、後者は採掘工業、原料工業、加工工業によって構成されている。No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.