Older patients with LBCL show comparable outcomes to younger patients and product-specific profiles in CAR-T therapy

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a key treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, data on its effectiveness and safety in older populations remain limited, particularly in real-world clinical practice. Moreover, comparative outcomes among different CAR-T products across age groups have not yet been fully characterized. We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. A total of 908 patients who received CAR-T therapy between January 2019 and September 2024 were included. Patients were categorized as younger (aged <65 years) or older (aged ≥65 years). Subgroup analyses were performed by CAR-T product (tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel], lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel], and axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel]). In univariate analysis, 1-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were comparable between younger and older patients (OS, 69.4% vs 65.7% [P = .40]; PFS, 47.9% vs 54.1% [P = .17]). In multivariate analysis, age ≥65 years showed no significant association with OS (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.21; P = .44). The incidence of immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome was significantly higher in older patients (12.7% vs 7.0%; P = .005). Compared with tisa-cel, axi-cel and liso-cel were associated with superior PFS, predominantly in younger patients. Among older patients, axi-cel was associated with higher nonrelapse mortality rate than tisa-cel. CAR-T therapy is feasible and effective for older patients with LBCL. These findings support age-adapted treatment strategies that consider both the efficacy and toxicity of each product.