<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-31J"?>
<ArticleSet xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Springer Science and Business Media LLC</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0925-8558</Issn>
      <Volume>32</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2023</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Against verb-stranding VP-ellipsis in Japanese: reply to Funakoshi (2016)</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>28</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Hidekazu</FirstName>
        <LastName>Tanaka</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Faculty of Letters, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi"/>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>Japanese has a deletion operation, called argument ellipsis, that targets arguments (Oku in A theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist program, 1998). The operation does not apply to adjuncts, and thus, adjuncts are unelidable. Funakoshi (J East Asian Linguist 25(2):113&#8211;42, 2016), following in the footsteps of Otani and Whitman (Linguist Inquiry 22:345&#8211;58, 1991), argues that adjuncts can be elided when V-stranding VP-deletion applies. This article refutes Funakoshi’s proposal. Under rigorous control, adjuncts are generally unelidable even when the context strongly favors the adjunct inclusive interpretation, showing that the language lacks VP-deletion. It is also shown that, for a small number of speakers who permit the adjunct inclusive interpretation, the interpretation is sensitive to island constraints. The observation is attributed to covert right dislocation (Tanaka in J Linguist 37:551&#8211;79, 2001), marginally available for such speakers.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Adjuncts</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Argument ellipsis</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Island constraints</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Right dislocation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">VP-deletion</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学文学部</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0285-4864</Issn>
      <Volume>66</Volume>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>とりたて詞のカートグラフィー</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">67</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>79</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Hidekazu</FirstName>
        <LastName>Tanaka</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/okadai-bun-kiyou/54800</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
