MDPI AG Acta Medica Okayama 2072-6694 18 4 2026 Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis in a High-Volume Center (TAKUMI-7) 602 EN Kosei Takagi Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Tomokazu Fuji Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kazuya Yasui Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Yuzo Umeda Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine Ryuichi Yoshida Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Motohiko Yamada Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Takeyoshi Nishiyama Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Yasuo Nagai Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Atene Ito Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Naohiro Okada Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Shohei Yokoyama Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Toshiyoshi Fujiwara Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Background/Objectives: Although the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) have been reported, studies investigating the advantages of RPD remain limited. Moreover, only a few studies have investigated the effects of robotic surgery on textbook outcomes (TO). Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 400 patients who underwent RPD and OPD at our institution between January 2017 and December 2025. Outcomes were compared between the RPD (n = 162) and OPD (n = 238) groups using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis. The factors associated with TO were examined. Results: Before PSM, significant differences were observed between the groups. PSM yielded RPD (n = 117) and OPD (n = 117) with equal preoperative factors. The RPD group demonstrated a significantly shorter operative time (402 vs. 444 min, p < 0.001), lesser blood loss (75 vs. 270 mL, p < 0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stays (13 vs. 22 days, p < 0.001), and fewer major complications (17.1 vs. 44.4%, p < 0.001), resulting in a higher TO achievement rate (76.9 vs. 52.1%, p = 0.001). Adjusted multivariate analyses identified robotic surgery (odds ratio 3.04, p < 0.001) as an independent predictor of TO. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that RPD was potentially superior to OPD in terms of short-term outcomes. Robotic surgery was significantly associated with TO after pancreatoduodenectomy at the expert�fs hand. No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

MDPI AG Acta Medica Okayama 2072-6694 18 4 2026 Antigen Remodeling in Colorectal Cancer: How Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Enhance Immunotherapy Responsiveness 715 EN Yuki Matsumi Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kunitoshi Shigeyasu Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Toshiaki Takahashi Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kazuya Moriwake Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Masashi Kayano Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Toshiyoshi Fujiwara Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Colorectal cancer (CRC) is traditionally considered a �gcold tumor�h characterized by low immunogenicity and limited responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, recent findings reveal that cytotoxic modalities can reprogram this immunologically inert landscape. This review integrates these evolving concepts to guide the optimization of future treatments. Radiotherapy induces extensive DNA double-strand breaks, which may generate de novo mutations through error-prone repair while simultaneously exposing cryptic antigens via increased transcriptional instability, alternative splicing, and enhanced proteasomal processing. Chemoradiation also amplifies epigenetic and epitranscriptomic sources of neoepitope diversity, including RNA editing and stress-induced splicing alterations, expanding the immunopeptidome beyond canonical mutation-driven neoantigens. These changes collectively enhance antigen presentation and facilitate T-cell priming. Chemotherapy further reduces immunosuppressive cell populations and promotes dendritic cell activation, creating a permissive milieu for subsequent immune engagement. Clinically, the VOLTAGE studies demonstrated that long-course chemoradiotherapy can sensitize even mismatch repair–proficient rectal cancers to PD-1 blockade, yielding clinically meaningful pathological responses. In contrast, mismatch repair–deficient rectal tumors may respond completely to ICIs alone. Short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and ICIs has also shown encouraging activity in the setting of total neoadjuvant therapy. Collectively, these findings support a paradigm in which radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and epigenetic/epitranscriptomic alterations�\including RNA editing�\act as potent modulators of tumor antigenicity. By expanding the neoantigen repertoire and reshaping the tumor microenvironment, these strategies can transform CRC from a cold tumor into one that is increasingly responsive to immunotherapy. No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.