Real‐World Data of Comprehensive Cancer Genomic Profiling Tests Performed in the Routine Clinical Setting in Sarcoma

Introduction: Next-generation sequencing-based comprehensive cancer genomic profiling (CGP) tests are beneficial for refining diagnosis and personalized treatment of various cancers. However, the clinical impact of CGP, as covered by public health insurance in the management of sarcomas, remains unknown. Especially, the data on the utility of the newly emerging dual DNA–RNA panel compared to the conventional DNA-only panel in clinical settings is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the utility of CGP in routine clinical practice for sarcoma treatment.
Patients and Methods: In this study, three types of DNA panel and one DNA–RNA panel, reimbursed by Japanese public health insurance, were utilized. We detected oncogenic and druggable gene mutations and genotype-matched therapies.
Results: One hundred and thirty-six patients were included in this study. Based on the detection of highly histology-specific translocations in the sequencing results, 2.2% of patients were re-classified. In patients with translocation-related sarcomas, a DNA–RNA panel identified more histology-specific fusion genes than DNA panels (p = 0.0035). Specifically, 86.8% and 39.0% of patients had oncogenic and druggable genomic alterations, respectively. Of these, 9.6% underwent genotype-matched therapy, with a 36.3% response rate and an 81.8% disease control rate. Patients who were administered genomically matched therapy had better overall survival (OS) than those who did not in patients with metastatic or advanced sarcoma with no prior chemotherapy (3-year OS: 83.3% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.42). Patients with TP53 and RB1 mutations had worse OS than those without. Germline findings were detected in 11.0% of the patients, one of whom had a truly germline origin.
Conclusions: This study suggests that publicly reimbursed CGP tests, particularly the dual DNA–RNA panel, could be beneficial for refining diagnostic precision in selected sarcoma subtypes, treatment decisions, detecting the germline findings, and prognosis prediction in routine clinical settings for sarcoma. The implementation of genotype-matched therapies showed favorable clinical outcomes and improved the prognosis.