| ID | 56598 |
| Sort Key | 4
|
| FullText URL | |
| Author |
Hidetomi, Omori
Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Okayama University
|
| Abstract | Republicanism has been divided into two strands, neo-Athenian and neo-Roman. This division, unlike others, is made in its historical origin. These strands are distinctive in their own conceptions of liberty: neo-Athenians view liberty as self-government while neo-Romans it as non-domination. Accordingly they have different views of the relationship between liberty and the rule of law: neo-Athenians see it as circular while neo-Romans as constitutive. Their views give us new perspectives and make us conscious of their defects as well; neo-Athenians cannot expel domination from selfgoverning politics while neo-Romans cannot show that legal rule protecting non-domination has its own public legitimacy. However, they prove to be complementary and give rich resources for our debate over the rule of law.
|
| Note | 論説 (Article)
|
| Publication Title |
Okayama Law Journal
|
| Published Date | 2019-03-19
|
| Volume | volume68
|
| Issue | issue3-4
|
| Publisher | 岡山大学法学会
|
| Publisher Alternative | The Association of Law of Okayama University
|
| Start Page | 926
|
| End Page | 879
|
| ISSN | 0386-3050
|
| NCID | AN00033040
|
| Content Type |
Departmental Bulletin Paper
|
| OAI-PMH Set |
岡山大学
|
| language |
English
|
| File Version | publisher
|
| Refereed |
True
|
| NAID | |
| Eprints Journal Name | olj
|
