このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 68898
FullText URL
suppl1.xlsx 30.2 KB
suppl2.xlsx 18.2 KB
Author
Tanimoto, Yuki Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Okayama University
Oita, Masataka Faculty of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Department of Healthcare Science, Okayama University Kaken ID researchmap
Koshi, Kazunobu Department of Radiology, NHO Fukuyama Medical Center
Ishiwaki, Kiyoshi Department of Radiology, NHO Iwakuni Medical Center
Hiramatsu, Futoshi Department of Radiology, NHO Hamada Medical Center
Sasaki, Toshihisa Department of Radiology, NHO Higashi-Hiroshima Medical Center
Ise, Hiroki Department of Radiology, NHO Iwakuni Medical Center
Miyagawa, Takashi Department of Radiology, NHO Kanmon Medical Center
Maeda, Takeshi Department of Radiology, NHO Kochi National Hospital
Okahira, Shinsuke Department of Radiology, NHO Yamaguchi-Ube Medical Center
Hamaguchi, Takashi Department of Radiology, NHO Okayama Medical Center
Kawaguchi, Tatsuya Department of Radiology, NHO Shikoku Medical Center for Children and Adults
Funada, Norihiro Department of Radiology, NHO Hamada Medical Center
Yamamoto, Shuhei Department of Radiology, NHO Fukuyama Medical Center
Hiroshige, Akira Department of Radiology, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center
Mukai, Yuki Department of Radiology, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center
Yoshida, Shohei Department of Radiology, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center
Fujita, Yoshiki Department of Radiology, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center
Nakahira, Atsuki Department of Radiology, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center
Honda, Hirofumi Department of Radiological Technology, Ehime University Hospital
Abstract
The advancement of irradiation technology has increased the demand for quality control of radiation therapy equipment. Consequently, the number of quality control items and required personnel have also increased. However, differences in the proportion of qualified personnel to irradiation techniques have caused bias in quality control systems among institutions. To standardize the quality across institutions, researchers should conduct mutual quality control by analyzing the quality control data of one institution at another institution and comparing the results with those of their own institutions. This study uses failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to identify potential risks in 12 radiation therapy institutions, compares the results before and after implementation of mutual quality control, and examines the utility of mutual quality control in risk reduction. Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness factor is introduced into FMEA to evaluate the utility of mutual quality control.
Keywords
Radiation therapy
Quality control
Failure mode and effects analysis
Cost-effectiveness
Published Date
2024-11-18
Publication Title
Radiological Physics and Technology
Volume
volume18
Issue
issue1
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Start Page
78
End Page
85
ISSN
1865-0333
NCID
AA12236881
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© The Author(s) 2024
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00857-z
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Citation
Tanimoto, Y., Oita, M., Koshi, K. et al. Standardization of radiation therapy quality control system through mutual quality control based on failure mode and effects analysis. Radiol Phys Technol 18, 78–85 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00857-z
Funder Name
Okayama University