このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 67551
FullText URL
fulltext.pdf 1.73 MB
Author
Ooba, Hikaru Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Hospital
Maki, Jota Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Hospital ORCID Kaken ID researchmap
Masuyama, Hisashi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Hospital Kaken ID publons researchmap
Abstract
Background Cesarean section (C-section) rates are increasing globally, and repeated C-sections are associated with increased maternal morbidity. Trial of labor after C-section (TOLAC) is an approach to reduce the recurrence of C-sections. However, limited research exists on the impact of cesarean scars on labor duration in TOLAC, considering the termination of labor through C-section and selection bias. This study aimed to investigate the impact of cesarean scars on labor duration in TOLAC participants, accounting for potential confounding factors and biases.
Methods This retrospective cohort study included 2,964 women who attempted vaginal birth at a single center in Japan from 2012 to 2021. The study categorized participants into TOLAC (n = 187) and non-TOLAC (n = 2,777) groups. Propensity scores were calculated based on 14 factors that could influence labor duration, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for labor duration, with and without IPTW adjustment. Sensitivity analyses used propensity score matching, bootstrapping, and interval censoring to address potential biases, including recall bias in the reported onset of labor.
Results The unadjusted HR for labor duration in the TOLAC group compared to the non-TOLAC group was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.98, P = 0.027), indicating a longer labor duration in the TOLAC group. After adjusting for confounding factors using IPTW, the HR was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.74-1.30, P = 0.91), suggesting no significant difference in labor duration between the groups. Sensitivity analyses using propensity score matching, bootstrapping, and interval censoring yielded consistent results. These findings suggested that the apparent association between TOLAC and longer labor duration was because of confounding factors rather than TOLAC itself.
Conclusions After adjusting for confounding factors and addressing potential biases, cesarean scars had a limited impact on labor duration in TOLAC participants. Maternal and fetal characteristics may have a more substantial influence on labor duration.
Keywords
Labor duration
Trial of labor after cesarean section
Vaginal birth
Cesarean section
Propensity scores
IPTW
Published Date
2024-08-15
Publication Title
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume
volume24
Issue
issue1
Publisher
BMC
Start Page
542
ISSN
1471-2393
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© The Author(s) 2024.
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06744-0
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Citation
Ooba, H., Maki, J. & Masuyama, H. Evaluating the impact of a trial of labor after cesarean section on labor duration: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 24, 542 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06744-0