このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 57321
FullText URL
Author
Katayama, Norihisa Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School Kaken ID researchmap
Nakamura, Katsumasa Department of Radiation Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
Yorozu, Atsunori Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center
Kikuchi, Takashi Translational Research Informatics Center
Fukushima, Masanori Translational Research Informatics Center
Saito, Shiro Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center
Dokiya, Takushi Department of Radiology, Kyoundo Hospital
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF) by risk group and treatment modality and the predictive factors of bFFF by risk group in patients with prostate cancer undergoing permanent seed implantation (PI) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in a nationwide prospective cohort study (Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 [I-125] Seed Implantation) in Japan during the first 2 years.
Methods and materials: The analyses included 2,316 participants in 42 institutions; bFFF was evaluated using the Phoenix definition and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the factors associated with bFFF.
Results: Median followup period was 60.0 months. The 5-year bFFF rates in all patients, 1,028 low-risk patients, 1,114 intermediate-risk patients, and 133 high-risk patients were 93.6%, 94.9%, 92.7%, and 91.1%, respectively. The 5-year bFFF rates in the PI group and EBRT combination therapy group were 93.7% and 93.3%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, younger age, higher Gleason score (GS), higher percent positive biopsies (%PB), and lower prostate V100 (p = 0.0012, 0.0030, 0.0026, and 0.0368) in all patients; younger age, higher pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and lower prostate V100 (p = 0.0002, 0.0048, and 0.0012) in low-risk patients; higher GS, higher %PB, and no hormonal treatment (p = 0.0005, 0.0120, and 0.0022) in intermediate-risk patients; and higher GS and higher %PB (p = 0.0329 and 0.0120) in high-risk patients were significantly associated with bFFF.
Conclusions: PI with or without EBRT resulted in excellent short-term biochemical outcomes in all risk groups, especially in high-risk patients. Age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and prostate V100 in low-risk patients; GS, %PB, and hormonal treatment in intermediate-risk patients; and GS and %PB in high-risk patients were independently affected bFFF.
Keywords
Biochemical failure
Brachytherapy
External beam radiation therapy
Predictive factors
Prostate cancer
Risk group
Published Date
2019-10-31
Publication Title
Brachytherapy
Volume
volume18
Issue
issue5
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
574
End Page
582
ISSN
15384721
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© 2019 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
File Version
author
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2019.03.008
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Citation
Norihisa Katayama, Katsumasa Nakamura, Atsunori Yorozu, Takashi Kikuchi, Masanori Fukushima, Shiro Saito, Takushi Dokiya,Biochemical outcomes and predictive factors by risk group after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation: Prospective cohort study in 2,316 patients, Brachytherapy, Volume 18, Issue 5, 2019, Pages 574-582, ISSN 1538-4721, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2019.03.008.
Open Access (Publisher)
non-OA
Open Archive (publisher)
Non-OpenArchive