このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 69986
FullText URL
Author
Akazawa, Hidemasa Department of Infectious Diseases, Okayama University Hospital
Fukushima, Shinnosuke Department of Infectious Diseases, Okayama University Hospital
Higuchi, Toshie Department of General Internal Medicine, Okayama Red Cross Hospital
Miyoshi, Tomoko Center for Medical Education and Internationalization, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
Nakano, Yasuhiro Department of General Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Iio, Koji Microbiology Division, Clinical Laboratory, Okayama University Hospital
Akamatsu, Yukinobu Department of General Medicine, Tottori Municipal Hospital
Haruki, Yuto Department of Pharmacy, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital
Iwamoto, Yoshitaka Department of General Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center
Tanaka, Shuichi Department of General Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Fujisato, Shun Department of Pharmacy, Okayama Rousai Hospital
Ako, Soichiro Department of General Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Hagiya, Hideharu Department of Infectious Diseases, Okayama University Hospital ORCID Kaken ID researchmap
Abstract
Background. Candidemia is a life-threatening infection with high mortality, and appropriate management is essential to improve patient outcomes. The Candida Care Bundle aims to standardize hospital management for patients with candidemia and reduce mortality.
Methods. This retrospective multicenter cohort study included candidemia cases from 9 hospitals in Japan between 2016 and 2023. Compliance to the Candida Care Bundle was evaluated based on 5 elements: central venous catheter removal within 24 hours, appropriate antifungal therapy, ophthalmologic examination, follow-up blood cultures, and antifungal treatment for ≥2 weeks after clearance. Patients were categorized into high (4–5 items) and low (0–3 items) compliance groups. The primary and secondary outcomes were defined as 30-day survival and the development of endophthalmitis, with propensity score matching used to adjust for potential confounders.
Results. Among 230 patients, 160 (69.5%) were classified into the high compliance group, which exhibited significantly lower 30-day mortality than the low compliance group (8.8% vs 57.1%, P < .01). Even after matching, the high compliance group remained independently associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .08–.30). C. albicans (HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.01–3.52) and central line-associated bloodstream infection (HR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.35–5.12) were associated with the fatal outcome. Endophthalmitis involved 23.6% of the patients, being associated with C. albicans (odds ratio [OR]: 8.18; 4.46–19.30) and central line-associated bloodstream infection (OR: 2.69; 1.08–6.70).
Conclusions. Strict compliance to the Candida Care Bundle significantly improves survival, underscoring its importance in candidemia management.
Keywords
candida bundle
candidemia
endophthalmitis
prognosis
propensity score matching
Published Date
2025-12-23
Publication Title
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Volume
volume13
Issue
issue1
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Start Page
ofaf790
ISSN
2328-8957
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© The Author(s) 2025.
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf790
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Citation
Hidemasa Akazawa, Shinnosuke Fukushima, Toshie Higuchi, Tomoko Miyoshi, Yasuhiro Nakano, Koji Iio, Yukinobu Akamatsu, Yuto Haruki, Yoshitaka Iwamoto, Shuichi Tanaka, Shun Fujisato, Soichiro Ako, Hideharu Hagiya, Impact of Candida Care Bundle Compliance on the Prognosis of Patients With Candidemia: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching Analysis (2016–2023), Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 13, Issue 1, January 2026, ofaf790, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf790