このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 71348
FullText URL
fulltext.pdf 2.31 MB
Author
Sugimoto, Koichi Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine
Toyoda, Shingo Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine
Inoki, Lan Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine
Mori, Keiichiro Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Yanagisawa, Takafumi Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Tamura, Keita Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
Nukaya, Takuhisa Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine
Maenosono, Ryoichi Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
Morinaka, Hirofumi Department of Urology, Kawasaki Medical School
Nishimura, Shingo Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Bekku, Kensuke Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Komura, Kazumasa Department of Urology, Kawasaki Medical School
Takahara, Kiyoshi Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine
Inamoto, Teruo Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
Azuma, Haruhito Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
Fujita, Kazutoshi Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitor plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO + IO) and immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO + TKI) regimens, have significantly improved outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, the prognostic impact of host-related factors in patients receiving these therapies remains unclear.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed 493 patients with mRCC treated with IO+IO (n = 205) or IO+TKI (n = 288) as first-line therapy. Survival outcomes and treatment responses were evaluated according to host-related factors using Cox proportional hazards models.
Results In the IO+IO cohort, multiple host-related factors were independently associated with worse overall survival, including BMI < 25 kg/m2 (HR 2.280, p = 0.007), dyslipidemia (HR 2.079, p = 0.019), PPI use (HR 1.605, p = 0.039), and opioid use (HR 2.919, p = 0.008). In contrast, in the IO+TKI cohort, only IMDC poor risk (HR 4.169, p < 0.001) and opioid use (HR 3.328, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with overall survival. Host-related factors showed limited associations with objective response and disease control rates in both cohorts.
Conclusion The prognostic impact of host-related factors differs according to treatment regimen in mRCC. These findings suggest that host immune and metabolic conditions play a more prominent role in immune-driven IO+IO therapy, whereas tumor-related factors may predominate in IO+TKI therapy.
Keywords
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Host-related factors
Prognosis
Combination therapy
Published Date
2026-06-11
Publication Title
International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume
volume31
Issue
issue8
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Start Page
1658
End Page
1667
ISSN
1341-9625
NCID
AA11086579
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© The Author(s) 2026
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-026-03075-2
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Citation
Sugimoto, K., Toyoda, S., Inoki, L. et al. Differential impact of host-related factors on survival outcomes between IO+IO and IO+TKI in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 31, 1658–1667 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-026-03075-2