このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加


ID 68355
JaLCDOI
FullText URL
79_1_021.pdf 3.18 MB
Author
Yamamoto, Yasuhiro Department of Radiology, Houshasen Daiichi Hospital
Haraguchi, Takafumi Department of Advanced Biomedical Imaging and Informatics, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
Matsuda, Kaori Department of Radiology, Houshasen Daiichi Hospital
Okazaki, Yoshio Department of Radiology, Houshasen Daiichi Hospital
Kimoto, Shin Department of Radiology, Houshasen Daiichi Hospital
Tanji, Nozomu Department of Urology, Houshasen Daiichi Hospital
Matsumoto, Atsushi Department of Urology, Houshasen Daiichi Hospital
Kobayashi, Yasuyuki Department of Medical Information and Communication Technology Research, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
Mimura, Hidefumi Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine
Hiraki, Takao Department of Radiology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Kaken ID publons researchmap
Abstract
We developed a machine learning model for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) grades using radiomic features of magnetic resonance imaging. 112 patients diagnosed with PCa based on prostate biopsy between January 2014 and December 2021 were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to construct two prediction models, one using radiomic features and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (Radiomics model) and the other Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores and PSA values (PI-RADS model), to differentiate high-grade (Gleason score [GS] ≥ 8) from intermediate or low-grade (GS < 8) PCa. Five imaging features were selected for the Radiomics model using the Gini coefficient. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. The models were compared by leave-one-out cross-validation with Ridge regularization. Furthermore, the Radiomics model was evaluated using the holdout method and represented by a nomogram. The AUC of the Radiomics and PI-RADS models differed significantly (0.799, 95% CI: 0.712-0.869; and 0.710, 95% CI: 0.617-0.792, respectively). Using holdout method, the Radiomics model yielded AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.552-0.925), sensitivity of 0.769, and specificity of 0.778. It outperformed the PI-RADS model and could be useful in predicting PCa grades, potentially aiding in determining appropriate treatment approaches in PCa patients.
Keywords
prostate cancer
machine learning
prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System
radiomics
Gleason score
Amo Type
Original Article
Publication Title
Acta Medica Okayama
Published Date
2025-02
Volume
volume79
Issue
issue1
Publisher
Okayama University Medical School
Start Page
21
End Page
30
ISSN
0386-300X
NCID
AA00508441
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
Copyright Holders
Copyright Ⓒ 2025 by Okayama University Medical School
File Version
publisher
Refereed
True
PubMed ID
Web of Science KeyUT