<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-31J"?>
<ArticleSet xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>‰ªŽR‘åŠw”_Šw•”</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2186-7755</Issn>
      <Volume>105</Volume>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>‘åŠw¶‚Ì’©HŒ‡HKŠµ‚Ì“Œv‰ðÍ‚Æ‰ü‘P‚Ö‚ÌVŽwj</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>5</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">T.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Tamura</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">T.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ibi</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">K.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Inagaki</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Y.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kubo</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">K.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Okuda</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi"/>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>This study investigated the current status and causes underneath the life of university students who tend to lack breakfast at a relatively high frequency, and statistical analysis on consequences leading to such lack of well-nourished eating habitat in their university life. In October 2014, self-assessed questionnaires were administered to over 150 faculty students. It contained questions about breakfast habits, time allowance for the morning class, and lunchtime setting in their high school timetable. Breakfast states were clearly separated in three groups : 68% of students regularly have breakfast throughout the weekdays, 21% students skipping the breakfast occasionally, and 11% student no habit for breakfast at all. The survey on the high school lives revealed that 70% students used to have lunch 30 min later than the lunchtime set in the university timetable, 7% of them had the lunch time even more than 1 h later. Lunchtime varies among high schools, and statistical significance was revealed (p&lt;0.01) that schools with higher deviation scores tend have late lunch beyond 12: 30. Accordingly, university students were given directions to prepare for the timetable reform on postulation of having lunch time over one ofclock. After continuous survey on the breakfast habits during the second semester, more than 90% of students established the habit of breakfast regularly in their university lives with the improved consciousness toward well-balanced healthy breakfast contents for their higher level of education quality.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Undernourished students</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">breakfast</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">lunchtime</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">statistical significance</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1932-6203</Issn>
      <Volume>8</Volume>
      <Issue>12</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2013</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Proliferation of Luteal Steroidogenic Cells in Cattle</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">e84186</FirstPage>
    <LastPage/>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shin</FirstName>
        <LastName>Yoshioka</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Hironori</FirstName>
        <LastName>Abe</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Ryosuke</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sakumoto</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Kiyoshi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Okuda</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi"/>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>The rapid growth of the corpus luteum (CL) after ovulation is believed to be mainly due to an increase in the size of luteal cells (hypertrophy) rather than an increase in their number. However, the relationship between luteal growth and the proliferation of luteal steroidogenic cells (LSCs) is not fully understood. One goal of the present study was to determine whether LSCs proliferate during CL growth. A second goal was to determine whether luteinizing hormone (LH), which is known have roles in the proliferation and differentiation of follicular cells, also affects the proliferation of LSCs. Ki-67 (a cell proliferation marker) was expressed during the early, developing and mid luteal stages and some Ki-67-positive cells co-expressed HSD3B (a steroidogenic marker). DNA content in LSCs isolated from the developing CL increased much more rapidly (indicating rapid growth) than did DNA content in LSCs isolated from the mid CL. The cell cycle-progressive genes CCND2 (cyclin D2) and CCNE1 (cyclin E1) mRNA were expressed more strongly in the small luteal cells than in the large luteal cells. LH decreased the rate of increase of DNA in LSCs isolated from the mid luteal stage but not in LSCs from the developing stage. LH suppressed CCND2 expression in LSCs from the mid luteal stage but not from the developing luteal stage. Furthermore, LH receptor (LHCGR) mRNA expression was higher at the mid luteal stage than at the developing luteal stage. The overall results suggest that the growth of the bovine CL is due to not only hypertrophy of LSCs but also an increase in their number, and that the proliferative ability of luteal steroidogenic cells decreases between the developing and mid luteal stages.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName/>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn/>
      <Volume/>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2003</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Multiple roles of TNF super family members in corpus luteum function</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete"/>
    <LastPage/>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Kiyoshi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Okuda</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Ryosuke</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sakumoto</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi"/>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;The main function of the corpus luteum (CL) is the production of progesterone. Adequate luteal progesterone is crucial for determining the physiological duration of the estrous cycle and for achieving a successful pregnancy. The CL is regulated not only by hypophyseal gonadotropin, but also by a number of cytokines that are locally produced. Tumor necrosis factor-&amp;#945; (TNF) and its specific receptors (TNFR) are present in the CL of many species. TNF plays multiple and likely
important roles in CL function throughout the estrous cycle. TNF appears to have luteotropic and luteolytic roles in the CLs. In contrast, Fas ligand (Fas L), another member of TNF super family(TNF-SF), is primarily recognized for its apoptotic actions. Presumably, Fas L binds its cognate receptor (Fas) to induce structural luteolysis. This review is designed to focus on recent studies documenting the expression of TNF and Fas L, their receptors, and intracellular signaling mechanisms in the CL.&lt;/p&gt;
</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
