<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-31J"?>
<ArticleSet xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Oxford University Press (OUP)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1347-6947</Issn>
      <Volume>88</Volume>
      <Issue>10</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Cytosolic acidification and oxidation are the toxic mechanisms of SO2 in Arabidopsis guard cells</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">1164</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>1171</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Mahdi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mozhgani</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Lia</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ooi</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Christelle</FirstName>
        <LastName>Espagne</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Universit&#233; Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC)</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Sophie</FirstName>
        <LastName>Filleur</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Universit&#233; Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC)</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Izumi C</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mori</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi"/>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>SO2/H2SO3 can damage plants. However, its toxic mechanism has still been controversial. Two models have been proposed, cytosolic acidification model and cellular oxidation model. Here, we assessed the toxic mechanism of H2SO3 in three cell types of Arabidopsis thaliana, mesophyll cells, guard cells (GCs), and petal cells. The sensitivity of GCs of Chloride channel a (CLCa)-knockout mutants to H2SO3 was significantly lower than those of wildtype plants. Expression of other CLC genes in mesophyll cells and petal cells were different from GCs. Treatment with antioxidant, disodium 4,5-dihydroxy-1,3-benzenedisulfonate (tiron), increased the median lethal concentration (LC50) of H2SO3 in GCs indicating the involvement of cellular oxidation, while the effect was negligible in mesophyll cells and petal cells. These results indicate that there are two toxic mechanisms of SO2 to Arabidopsis cells: cytosolic acidification and cellular oxidation, and the toxic mechanism may vary among cell types.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">cytosolic acidification</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Arabidopsis</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">cellular oxidation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">chloride channel a</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">sulfur dioxide</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>&#169; 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>00456535</Issn>
      <Volume>247</Volume>
      <Issue/>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Application of the cellular oxidation biosensor to Toxicity Identification Evaluations for high-throughput toxicity assessment of river water</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">125933</FirstPage>
    <LastPage/>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Lia</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ooi</LastName>
        <Affiliation> Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Keisuke</FirstName>
        <LastName>Okazaki</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Carlos R.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Arias-Barreiro</LastName>
        <Affiliation>nstitute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Lee Yook</FirstName>
        <LastName>Heng</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Southeast Asia Disaster Prevention Research Initiative (SEADPRI-UKM), Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), The National University of Malaysia</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Izumi C.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mori</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi"/>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) is a useful method for the classification and identification of toxicants in a composite environment water sample. However, its extension to a larger sample size has been restrained owing to the limited throughput of toxicity bioassays. Here we reported the development of a high-throughput method of TIE Phase I. This newly developed method was assisted by the fluorescence-based cellular oxidation (CO) biosensor fabricated with roGFP2-expressing bacterial cells in 96-well microplate format. The assessment of four river water samples from Langat river basin by this new method demonstrated that the contaminant composition of the four samples can be classified into two distinct groups. The entire toxicity assay consisted of 2338 tests was completed within 12 h with a fluorescence microplate reader. Concurrently, the sample volume for each assay was reduced to 50 ƒÊL, which is 600 to 4700 times lesser to compare with conventional bioassays. These imply that the throughput of the CO biosensor-assisted TIE Phase I is now feasible for constructing a large-scale toxicity monitoring system, which would cover a whole watershed scale.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">High-throughput cytotoxicity biosensor</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Toxicity identification evaluation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">River water pollution</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Ecotoxicity management</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Integrated watershed management</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Wiley</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0140-7791</Issn>
      <Volume>42</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>The mechanism of SO2 -induced stomatal closure differs from O3 and CO2 responses and is mediated by nonapoptotic cell death in guard cells.</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">437</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>447</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Lia</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ooi </LastName>
        <Affiliation> Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Takakazu</FirstName>
        <LastName>Matsuura</LastName>
        <Affiliation> Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shintaro</FirstName>
        <LastName>Munemasa</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Yoshiyuki</FirstName>
        <LastName>Murata</LastName>
        <Affiliation>Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Maki</FirstName>
        <LastName>Katsuhara</LastName>
        <Affiliation> Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Takashi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Hirayama</LastName>
        <Affiliation> Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Izumi C.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mori</LastName>
        <Affiliation> Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University</Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi"/>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract> Plants closing stomata in the presence of harmful gases is believed to be a stress avoidance mechanism. SO2 , one of the major airborne pollutants, has long been reported to induce stomatal closure, yet the mechanism remains unknown. Little is known about the stomatal response to airborne pollutants besides O3 . SLOW ANION CHANNEL-ASSOCIATED 1 (SLAC1) and OPEN STOMATA 1 (OST1) were identified as genes mediating O3 -induced closure. SLAC1 and OST1 are also known to mediate stomatal closure in response to CO2 , together with RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOGs (RBOHs). The overlaying roles of these genes in response to O3 and CO2 suggested that plants share their molecular regulators for airborne stimuli. Here, we investigated and compared stomatal closure event induced by a wide concentration range of SO2 in Arabidopsis through molecular genetic approaches. O3 - and CO2 -insensitive stomata mutants did not show significant differences from the wild type in stomatal sensitivity, guard cell viability, and chlorophyll content revealing that SO2 -induced closure is not regulated by the same molecular mechanisms as for O3 and CO2 . Nonapoptotic cell death is shown as the reason for SO2 -induced closure, which proposed the closure as a physicochemical process resulted from SO2 distress, instead of a biological protection mechanism.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">airborne pollutants</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">nonapoptotic cell death</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">stomatal closure</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">sulfur dioxide</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
