<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>46</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2014</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>混合複占，シュタッケルベルク・リーダーシップ及びR&amp;D投資</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">23</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>41</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/53093</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>42</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2011</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>品質の選択，垂直的製品差別化と労働者管理寡占</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>15</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/44386</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>Although quality choice of profit-maximizing oligopolistic firms has been widely analyzed, it is rare to find such an analysis of labor-managed oligopolistic firms. This paper considers the relationship between vertical product differentiation and labor-managed firms in either partial or full market coverage by using a two-stage game model. At the second stage they are involved in either Bertrand or Cournot competition. Then some results, which are different from those derived from the conventional firms, are obtained. For example, 1) when
labor-managed firms are involved in price competition in an output market, there exists an interior solution only in an extremely limited case; 2) fixed costs affect not only price and output levels but also the level of
quality under both price and quantity competition; and 3) it is impossible to analyze under full market coverage, irrespective of whether labor-managed firms are involved in price or quantity competition in an output market.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>25</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>1994</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>労働者管理産業における既存企業は参入を阻止するために超過生産能力を保有するか？</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">223</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>240</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/41785</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>26</Volume>
      <Issue>3-4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>1995</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>輸出補助金と労働者管理企業と利潤最大化企業の国際的複占</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">195</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>209</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/41722</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>30</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>1999</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>戦略的ゲームとスピルオーバー下のR&amp;D投資</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">107</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>124</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/41549</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>The paper considers the problem of whether in a strategic two-stage game duopolistic firms make an overinvestment or underinvestment in R &amp; D when there are their spillovers. We deal with two cases of Cournot quantity and Bertrand price competitions. It is shown that in Cournot (Bertrand) competition each firm has an incentive to use a larger (less) or less (larger) investment than the one required to minimize the costs of investment according as its rival's spillover rate is relatively small or large.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>31</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2000</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>A Note on Capital Commitment and Cournot Competition with Labour-Managed and Profit-Maximising Firms</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">285</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>302</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/41522</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>This paper shows that the discussion of Lambertini and Rossini (1998) as to the strategic investment levels oflabour-managed firms in a
labour-managed (LM) duopoly is misleading. This is due to the fact that there is no duality between the conditions for maximisation and
minimisation, and what is worse, an equilibrium needed for comparison is interior when the investment behaviour of the firms is discussed along the conventional method. We reconsider whether they overinvest or underinvest in R&amp;D, employing a more general model with R&amp;D spillovers. It is demonstrated that results obtained in the LM duopoly are similar to those in a conventional duopoly of profit-maximising firms.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>34</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2002</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Cooperative and Noncooperative R&amp;D in Cournot and Bertrand Duopolies with Spillovers, and Their Comparison</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>18</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/40600</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>35</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2004</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Disclosure Policy, and Competition and Cartelization in R&amp;D: Cournot and Bertrand Competition</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>25</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/40590</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>This paper considers whether firms have incentives to disclose their R&amp;D information to their rivals in Cournot−quantity setting and Bertrand−price setting models. Furthermore, we compare market performances, e.g. R&amp;D investments, prices and profits, in these models. It is shown that whether they have such incentives
depends only on the signs of cross−price effects in demand functions, irrespective of the type of competition, e.g. Cournot or Bertrand competition. When making comparisons of them among four modes, we find that the formation of R&amp;D cartels tends to increase the expenditure of R&amp;D investment and then gains more profits.
Alternatively, we point out that quantity−setting firms gain more profits in the presence of R&amp;D cooperation than in the absence of it when products are substitutes in terms of Cournot competition.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0386-3069</Issn>
      <Volume>36</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2005</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>R&amp;D, Privatization, Public Monopoly, Mixed Oligopoly, and Productive Efficiency</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">15</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>27</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/40535</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>We investigate R&amp;D behavior of public firms by using oligopoly models with Cournot−type−quantity and Bertrand−type−price competition. Then the following results are obtained. When public and private firms in a mixed oligopoly market are involved in quantity competition, (i) the public firm has a greater incentive to invest in cost−reducing R&amp;D in a public monopoly market than in that market if they are substitutes, and (ii) the public firm has a less incentive to invest in R&amp;D in the oligopoly market if they are complements. Furthermore, suppose that public and private firms in a mixed oligopoly market are involved in price competition. (i) If the products are complements, then a public firm has a greater incentive to invest in cost−reducing R&amp;D in the public monopoly market than in the mixed oligopoly market; and (ii) if they are substitutes, then the public firm has a less incentive to invest in cost−reducing R&amp;D in the public monopoly market than in the mixed oligopoly
market.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList/>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学経済学会</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>03863069</Issn>
      <Volume>38</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2007</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>What, How and Why Happened in Afghanistan?: A Study ofPolitical Economic History of the Early 20th Century</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>19</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N"/>
        <LastName/>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/OER/12404</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>It is significant to thoroughly scrutinize past practices and feats, to identify important factors towards developmental failure and success and to avoid mistakes for the future of an industrialized and prosperous Afghanistan. As a result of profound research, a number of researchers have added to the literature on the country’s history, culture, wars, strategic importance and position as a buffer state that cover Afghan polity, ideological dimensions, and social and cultural intricacies.
However, few scholarly works exist on the political economy in general and on the historical economic performances and policies in detail. Drawing upon immense and varied literature, the purpose of this paper is to analyze and describe historical and social changes, economic structures and strategies of Afghanistan with a detailed account of (i) political vision, (ii)
institutional reforms, (iii) economic agendas, and (iv) development progress in the light of economic development theory and practice. We conclude that being provided right policies and firm political determination, Afghanistan has the potential to become a more developed country in the short span of time.</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Economic History</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Development Economics</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Afghan Economy</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学大学院文化科学研究科</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1880-8476</Issn>
      <Volume>3</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2006</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>混合複占と研究開発戦略</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">55</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>70</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N"/>
        <LastName/>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/9610</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>　本論文は企業の研究開発（R＆D）行動とこれが産出量等に与える影響を利潤最大化企業と労働者管理企業からなる混合寡占の２段階ゲームモデルを用いて分析したものである。この分析では新たに企業の推測的変動が導入されている。この分析によって両段階とも労働者管理企業にとって寡占の特徴である相互依存関係が消滅することが明らかにされた。さらに、各種パラメータに関する比較静学分析からR＆Dスピルオーバー比率の上昇は利潤最大化企業と異なり、労働者管理企業のR＆D投資を減少させることが示される。加えて、固定費がR＆D投資決定に影響を与え、これが労働者管理企業のR＆D投資水準に影響を与えることが示される。</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">研究開発投資</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">混合寡占</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">R＆Dスピルオーバー</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">労働者管理企業</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">推測敵変動</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学大学院文化科学研究科</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1880-8476</Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2005</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>日本企業の対中技術移転戦略 : アンケート調査に基づくインプリケーション</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">79</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>89</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N"/>
        <LastName/>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/9062</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">日本企業</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">日系企業</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">中国進出</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">技術移転</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">アンケート</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">インプリケーション</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学大学院文化科学研究科</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1880-8476</Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2005</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>対中国進出日系企業の研究開発の現状分析</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">61</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>78</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N">Shoji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haruna</LastName>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/9061</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract>中国経済の目覚しい発展がその経済開放政策の実施以降続いている。中国の経済発展の原動力の1つが外国企業の中国進出および中国の外資導入策である。賃金の安い労働力を求めて多くの日本企業が中国に進出した。そして90年代後半以降その動きが加速化された。この流れを受けて、日本企業の対中国直接投資の現状とその特徴について予備的な分析を行った。</Abstract>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">中国</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">日系企業</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">経済開放政策</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">研究開発</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>岡山大学大学院文化科学研究科</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Okayama</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1880-8476</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2004</Year>
        <Month/>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>日本企業の対中国直接投資の現状について</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage LZero="delete">145</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>172</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName EmptyYN="N"/>
        <LastName/>
        <Affiliation/>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType/>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.18926/9052</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <Abstract/>
    <CoiStatement>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</CoiStatement>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">日本企業</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">中国</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">直接投資</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ReferenceList/>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
