| ID | 70237 |
| FullText URL | |
| Author |
Toyoda, Shingo
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University
Inoki, Lan
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University
Hashimoto, Mamoru
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University
Fukuokaya, Wataru
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Mori, Keiichiro
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Nishimura, Shingo
Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Maenosono, Ryoichi
Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
Iwata, Takehiro
Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Kaken ID
Bekku, Kensuke
Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Nukaya, Takuhisa
Department of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine
Yanagisawa, Takafumi
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Tsujino, Takuya
Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
Komura, Kazumasa
Department of Urology, Kawasaki University School of Medicine
Takahara, Kiyoshi
Department of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine
Inamoto, Teruo
Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
Azuma, Haruhito
Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
Fujita, Kazutoshi
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University
JK-FOOT study group
|
| Abstract | Few studies have investigated the efficacy of immuno-oncology (IO) combinations at different metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We evaluated the differential efficacy of IO–IO and IO–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations by metastatic site in metastatic RCC (mRCC). This retrospective multicenter study by the JK-FOOT Study Group included 579 patients with intermediate- or poor-risk mRCC (per International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium criteria) treated with first-line IO combinations between September 2018 and December 2024. Metastatic sites were lymph nodes, lungs, bones, liver, brain, and others. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoint was objective response rate. Efficacy was compared between IO–IO and IO–TKI for each site. For lymph node (n = 36), lung (n = 132), or brain (n = 16) metastases, OS or PFS was not significantly different between IO–IO and IO–TKI. In bone metastases (n = 80), OS tended to favor IO–TKI (P = 0.053). In liver metastases (n = 22), OS was significantly longer with IO–TKI (P = 0.011). IO–TKI may be a more appropriate first-line option than IO–IO for mRCC with bone or liver metastases, while efficacy is similar for other sites.
|
| Keywords | Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Bone metastasis
liver metastasis
Immuno-oncology
|
| Published Date | 2026-01-13
|
| Publication Title |
Scientific Reports
|
| Volume | volume16
|
| Issue | issue1
|
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC
|
| Start Page | 3303
|
| ISSN | 2045-2322
|
| Content Type |
Journal Article
|
| language |
English
|
| OAI-PMH Set |
岡山大学
|
| Copyright Holders | © The Author(s) 2025
|
| File Version | publisher
|
| PubMed ID | |
| DOI | |
| Web of Science KeyUT | |
| Related Url | isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33198-x
|
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
|
| Citation | Toyoda, S., Inoki, L., Hashimoto, M. et al. Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies by metastatic site in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 16, 3303 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33198-x
|