このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 70237
FullText URL
fulltext.pdf 3.35 MB
Author
Toyoda, Shingo Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University
Inoki, Lan Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University
Hashimoto, Mamoru Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University
Fukuokaya, Wataru Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Mori, Keiichiro Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Nishimura, Shingo Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Maenosono, Ryoichi Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
Iwata, Takehiro Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Kaken ID
Bekku, Kensuke Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine
Nukaya, Takuhisa Department of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine
Yanagisawa, Takafumi Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Tsujino, Takuya Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
Komura, Kazumasa Department of Urology, Kawasaki University School of Medicine
Takahara, Kiyoshi Department of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine
Inamoto, Teruo Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
Azuma, Haruhito Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
Fujita, Kazutoshi Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University
JK-FOOT study group
Abstract
Few studies have investigated the efficacy of immuno-oncology (IO) combinations at different metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We evaluated the differential efficacy of IO–IO and IO–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations by metastatic site in metastatic RCC (mRCC). This retrospective multicenter study by the JK-FOOT Study Group included 579 patients with intermediate- or poor-risk mRCC (per International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium criteria) treated with first-line IO combinations between September 2018 and December 2024. Metastatic sites were lymph nodes, lungs, bones, liver, brain, and others. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoint was objective response rate. Efficacy was compared between IO–IO and IO–TKI for each site. For lymph node (n = 36), lung (n = 132), or brain (n = 16) metastases, OS or PFS was not significantly different between IO–IO and IO–TKI. In bone metastases (n = 80), OS tended to favor IO–TKI (P = 0.053). In liver metastases (n = 22), OS was significantly longer with IO–TKI (P = 0.011). IO–TKI may be a more appropriate first-line option than IO–IO for mRCC with bone or liver metastases, while efficacy is similar for other sites.
Keywords
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Bone metastasis
liver metastasis
Immuno-oncology
Published Date
2026-01-13
Publication Title
Scientific Reports
Volume
volume16
Issue
issue1
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Start Page
3303
ISSN
2045-2322
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© The Author(s) 2025
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Web of Science KeyUT
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33198-x
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Citation
Toyoda, S., Inoki, L., Hashimoto, M. et al. Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies by metastatic site in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 16, 3303 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33198-x