このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 70551
FullText URL
fulltext.pdf 1010 KB
Author
Fukuda, Yoshitake Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Akagi, Satoshi Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID Kaken ID
Taya, Satoshi Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Ejiri, Kentaro Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID publons researchmap
Takaya, Yoichi Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences ORCID Kaken ID
Dohi, Yoshihiro Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kure Kyosai Hospital
Yuasa, Shinsuke Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Abstract
Background The current guideline recommends a peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) ≥2.9 m/s on echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension (PH) screening; however, this threshold was based on the previous PH definition (mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mm Hg) and derived largely from PH referral centres.
Methods We retrospectively analysed 755 patients who underwent both transthoracic echocardiography and right heart catheterisation at two general hospitals. The discrimination of peak TRV and estimated right atrial pressure (eRAP), derived from inferior vena cava diameter and respiratory variation, for screening for PH was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Optimal cut-off values were determined with the Youden Index.
Results The c-statistic for peak TRV in detecting PH was 0.82 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.85). An optimal cut-off of 2.7 m/s provided higher sensitivity (72%) than the conventional 2.9 m/s threshold (60%) while maintaining high specificity (82%). In 681 patients with available TRV and eRAP data, adding eRAP improved discrimination compared with TRV alone (c-statistic 0.83 vs 0.80; net reclassification improvement=0.14, p=0.002). eRAP ≥5 mm Hg was associated with a higher risk of PH, and the combination of elevated TRV and eRAP yielded the strongest association.
Conclusion For screening under the revised PH definition, a peak TRV of 2.7 m/s is suggested as the optimal cut-off. Although TRV alone showed good discriminative performance, combining it with eRAP further improved diagnostic accuracy using simple echocardiographic measures.
Published Date
2026-01
Publication Title
Open Heart
Volume
volume13
Issue
issue1
Publisher
BMJ
Start Page
e004185
ISSN
2053-3624
Content Type
Journal Article
language
English
OAI-PMH Set
岡山大学
Copyright Holders
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
File Version
publisher
PubMed ID
DOI
Related Url
isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2026-004185
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Citation
Fukuda Y, Akagi S, Taya S, Ejiri K, Takaya Y, Dohi Y, et al. Predictive value of simple echocardiographic parameters for screening pulmonary hypertension under the revised definition: a study for general hospitals. Open Heart. 2026;13:e004185. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2026-004185