Acta Medica Okayama volume79 issue1
2025-02 発行
Maeda, Shigeru
Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo
Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
Yoshida, Michihiro
Data Science Division, Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital
Hosoi, Hiroki
Data Science Division, Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital
Ohshima, Ayako
Data Science Division, Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital
Kurisu, Ryoko
Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo
Utsumi, Nozomi
Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo
Higuchi, Hitoshi
Department of Dental Anesthesiology and Special Care Dentistry, Okayama University Hospital
ORCID
Kaken ID
Miyawaki, Takuya
Department of Dental Anesthesiology and Special Care Dentistry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Kaken ID
publons
We retrospectively analyzed the safety of the use of articaine, an amide-type local anesthetic, in Japanese dental patients (n=300) treated in Thailand in 2015-2017. The dosage, adverse events (AEs) caused by local anesthesia, and treatment efficacy were examined. Articaine, which is safe for patients with liver impairments due to its unique metabolism, has not been thoroughly tested in Japan for doses above 5.1 mL. Eighty of the present patients had undergone root canal treatment (RCT), 71 underwent tooth extraction, and 149 underwent implant-related surgery. More than three articaine cartridges were used in 41 patients, and no AEs occurred in these cases. The only AE occurred in a 52-year-old woman who was treated with three cartridges and presented with what appeared to be hyperventilation syndrome; she later recovered and received her dental treatment as scheduled. Most treatments were completed with three or fewer cartridges, suggesting that this number is generally sufficient. Our findings, particularly the low AE risk even with doses exceeding three cartridges, support the potential applicability of the overseas recommended maximum dose of articaine (7 mg/kg) in Japanese patients. This conclusion is significant for advancing dental anesthetic practices and ensuring patient safety and treatment efficacy in Japan.