Title Alternative A Study on the Role required for Mental capacity : An Analysis of recent Cases
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_478_512.pdf
Author Ichiwara, S.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 512
End Page 478
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative From U.S. Judicial Precedents about Prisoners’ Artificial Insemination
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_513_570.pdf
Author Matano, E.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 570
End Page 513
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_571_598.pdf
Author Yabuki, K.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 598
End Page 571
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_599_634.pdf
Author Furukawa, Y.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 634
End Page 599
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative Le préjudice moral résultant de l’atteinte à la propriété
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_635_688.pdf
Author Murata, K.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 688
End Page 635
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative Grundrechtseingriffe als Wesentlichkeit ?
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_689_740.pdf
Author Yamada, S.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 740
End Page 689
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative The Basic Functions of Basis: Theory and Doctrine in Income Tax Systems
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_742_788.pdf
Author Kozuka, M.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 788
End Page 742
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative Reconsidering of Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_789_810.pdf
Author Koura, M.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 810
End Page 789
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative L’expropriation pour l’utilité publique au service de la prévention des risques naturels
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_811_854.pdf
Author Fukushige, S.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 854
End Page 811
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_335_358.pdf
Author Hamada, Y.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 335
End Page 358
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative Right to Demand the Rescission of Fraudulent Testamentary Disposition
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_855_878.pdf
Author Iwado, M.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 878
End Page 855
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_879_926.pdf
Author Hidetomi, Omori|
Abstract Republicanism has been divided into two strands, neo-Athenian and neo-Roman. This division, unlike others, is made in its historical origin. These strands are distinctive in their own conceptions of liberty: neo-Athenians view liberty as self-government while neo-Romans it as non-domination. Accordingly they have different views of the relationship between liberty and the rule of law: neo-Athenians see it as circular while neo-Romans as constitutive. Their views give us new perspectives and make us conscious of their defects as well; neo-Athenians cannot expel domination from selfgoverning politics while neo-Romans cannot show that legal rule protecting non-domination has its own public legitimacy. However, they prove to be complementary and give rich resources for our debate over the rule of law.
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 926
End Page 879
ISSN 0386-3050
language 英語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative Institutional Design of Bicameralism in the Legislative Process of the Constitution of Japan and the Diet Law : Case of Claim Provisions for Conference Committee of both Houses
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_297_333.pdf
Author Kinoshita, Kazuaki|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 297
End Page 333
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative Limits on pro rata, per capita or Another Arrangement of Shareholders Rights in bylaws
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_927_946.pdf
Author Suzuki, Takamoto|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
Start Page 946
End Page 927
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
FullText URL olj_68_3-4_contents.pdf
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2019-03-19
Volume volume68
Issue issue3-4
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
FullText URL olj_68_2_contents_eng.pdf
Author 岡山大学法学会|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2018-12-27
Volume volume68
Issue issue2
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
FullText URL olj_68_2_colophon.pdf
Author 岡山大学法学会|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2018-12-27
Volume volume68
Issue issue2
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative Die Übersetzung von Jherings Briefe(3)
FullText URL olj_68_2_(001)_(037).pdf
Author Hirata, K.|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2018-12-27
Volume volume68
Issue issue2
Start Page 294
End Page 258
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
FullText URL olj_68_2_249_255.pdf
Author 岡山公法判例研究会|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2018-12-27
Volume volume68
Issue issue2
Start Page 249
End Page 255
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher
Title Alternative Does Real Estate applicable “Object” that Article 521 of the Commercial Code Prescribes as Commercial Right to Retention
FullText URL olj_68_2_231_247.pdf
Author Yoshioka, Shinichi|
Publication Title Okayama Law Journal
Published Date 2018-12-27
Volume volume68
Issue issue2
Start Page 231
End Page 247
ISSN 0386-3050
language 日本語
File Version publisher